Bug#1016112: transition: phodav 3.0 & friends
- To: Jeremy Bicha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>, 1016112@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1016112: transition: phodav 3.0 & friends
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:32:10 +0200
- Message-id: <Yul7uplC85e/otbZ@ramacher.at>
- Reply-to: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>, 1016112@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CAD+GYvyXtm5HLcm1YANVwKGL9UFmn=qzWyEBhQNaaFhhvDtU2Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD+GYvyXtm5HLcm1YANVwKGL9UFmn=qzWyEBhQNaaFhhvDtU2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD+GYvyXtm5HLcm1YANVwKGL9UFmn=qzWyEBhQNaaFhhvDtU2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-07-27 08:32:41 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Tags: moreinfo
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: phodav@packages.debain.org
> Severity: normal
>
> I am filing this bug for the phodav transition. Affected packages are:
> phodav
> spice-gtk
> libosinfo
> virt-viewer
> remmina
> gnome-boxes
> There was no soname bump for most of this transition and I don't have
> a ben file for it.
If I read https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-phodav.html
correctly, then there was a SONAME bump and only spice-gtk needs a
rebuild. Is the ben file wrong? Please clarify
Cheers
>
> All of these packages require sourceful uploads. I am a team uploader
> for all these packages except for Remmina.
>
> I am filing this bug as moreinfo since I want coordination from the
> Remmina maintainer before starting this transition in Unstable.
>
> Perhaps too much detail:
> https://discourse.gnome.org/t/phodav-transition-notes/10483
>
> I successfully completed this transition recently in Ubuntu 22.10.
>
> This transition allows completing a small part of the big GNOME 43
> libsoup transition without entangling as many packages.
>
> Thank you,
> Jeremy Bicha
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: