Bug#827061: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?

To: 827061@bugs.debian.org, 827061-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#827061: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?
From: Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:15:26 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 6cba2063-5aaa-2762-e20f-101947abe45e@debian.org>
Reply-to: Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

I'm maintaining two packages affected by this transition. So far, I've
just been monitoring the situation, as I share many of the concerns that
have been raised on -devel.

Is it an acceptable solution to instead build-depend on libbsl1.0-dev,
downgrade the severity of the FTBFS with 1.1.0 bug to important, and
unblock the transition by it?

Many thanks and regards
Afif

-- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

Prev by Date: Processed: Part of the OpenSSL transition
Next by Date: Processed: courier: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#845156: jessie-pu: package monotone/1.1-4+deb8u2
Next by thread: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread