On 23.07.2015 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2015-07-23 16:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2015-07-23 15:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
By the way, do you know why vtk6 is shown as bad in the transition
tracker,
even though it built successfully with ffmpeg?
Because building successfully doesn't mean building sanely.
Package: libvtk6.1
Source: vtk6 (6.1.0+dfsg2-6)
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-6+b1
Specifically, I got the right reason but the wrong reason for it. :-)
It's still bad because libvtk6.1 is still in sid. And libvtk6.1 is
still
in sid because of the mess that is the vtk6 "transition" (#749395,
which
has been going on for over a year now).
Ah, that explains it. There is a vtk6.1 -> vtk6.2 transition [1]
going on in the middle of the vtk -> vtk6 transition [2].
Maybe scheduling binNMUs for the packages depending on libvtk6.1
(gammaray, liggghts, mia, nifti2dicom, therion) would help?