* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> [150709 10:56]: > On 08/07/15 14:11, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please schedule binNMUs for these packages, which now have their > > dependencies fulfilled (and build fine in my tests): > > > > ruby-eventmachine_1.0.7-1 > > ruby-hpricot_0.8.6-5 > > ruby-lapack_1.6-2 > > ruby-lapack-dbg_1.6-2 > > unicorn_4.8.3-1 > > Scheduled. You listed ruby-lapack and ruby-lapack-dbg. I guess the latter was a > mistake. Indeed, sorry. > > I think after those we're left mostly with packages that only build > > for the first ruby version they find, some broken "leaf-y" ruby > > libs, plus ruby-yajl and ruby-redcloth which impact a larger chain. > > ruby-yajl and ruby-redcloth are marked as good in the tracker. What's the > problem with them? Fellow team members have fixed them in the meantime, so they're no longer a problem. Please also schedule a binNMU for this package: ruby-http-parser.rb_0.6.0-2 > I guess the next step is making ruby2.2 the default (probably in experimental > first and making sure things still build properly, particularly those that only > build for the default version). Yup; Antonio has uploaded a new ruby-defaults to experimental Yesterday evening. > Cheers, > Emilio Thank you, Christian > P.S.: try not to break threading -- ,''`. Hofstaedtler Christian <zeha@debian.org> : :' : Developer Debian `. `' CFFA 7D1A D9E0 9C4C 806C 5C13 D392 9305 D6DB 2E03 `-
Attachment:
pgpXPmlXbQfJG.pgp
Description: PGP signature