Bug#791403: pu: ganglia-modules-linux/1.3.6-2
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> tags 791403 = jessie
> stop
>
> On 04/07/15 15:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > usertags 791403 = pu
> > tags 791403 = jessie moreinfo
> > thanks
> >
> > On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 14:17 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> >> UserTags: unblock
> >>
> >>
> >> This is a proposed upload to stable for jessie.
> >
> > Then it's not an unblock request.
> >
>
> Sorry about that, I had actually look at a couple of other bugs in the
> BTS and they had unblock so I copied it. I won't do it again.
For stable updates?
Hmmm, there will be a few that started off as unblock requests before
release and got converted to p-u requests afterwards as they didn't make
it before release. There shouldn't be any stable update requests that
are tagged "unblock" /now/ though.
[...]
> I am also keen to make sure I'm
> really doing the right thing in postinst and postrm, I would welcome any
> other opinions on that.
My initial thought was that if the plugins need the daemon to be
restarted then it feels like there should be a better method, e.g. a
trigger. That's likely to be too heavy-weight a change for a stable
update though.
> In any case, I've now gone and made a branch for jessie and built a
> package, there is a debdiff attached
Thanks.
> I looked at the email in that link, it mentions the +deb8u1 suffix. If
> the stable update is identical to the version that was uploaded to
> unstable then is it necessary to use a suffix?
You can't upload two different packages with the same version, or the
same package to multiple suites, so yes.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: