Bug#755094: transition: harfbuzz
On 29/07/14 20:37, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 15:24:58 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
>
>> My question, should I add HB_VERSION_CHECK as it was before 0.9.30 ?
>> Or should I add it as an alias for HB_VERSION_ATLEAST ?
>>
> Bring it back with the old implementation, I would say.
Yes.
You can upload it directly to unstable (e.g. 0.9.32-1 with
HB_VERSION_CHECK/hb_version_check added back) with the old package name
(libharfbuzz0b). Then the packages in experimental with the renamed package will
be removed.
Emilio
Reply to: