Re: wheezy-ignore for GFDL and "postinst uses /usr/share/doc" bugs?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2013-11-28 19:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-06-03 13:17, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> looking at http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy&rc=1 I
>> wonder if it would be appropriate to tag all these GDFL-issues
>> and "postinst uses /usr/share/doc" bugs with wheezy-ignore,
>> assuming they probably will not be fixed in wheezy and if they
>> had existed a month ago they would have been tagged
>> wheezy-ignore too.
>
>> What do you think?
>
>> [...]
>
>> cheers, Holger
>
>
>
> Hi Holger and Andreas,
>
> Sorry for the late decision on this... and for only giving a
> partial one at this time.
>
> The "/usr/share/doc"-issues can receive a wheezy-ignore tag. That
> said, we are still open to p-u uploads fixing such bugs. We are
> still undecided on the GFDL ones for now.
>
> ~Niels
>
And to close this, we have decided to ignore GFDL issues in Wheezy and
Squeeze provided that the problem is limited to conflicts with the
DFSG. Should there be any bugs where the GFDL license with invariants
causes more issues (e.g. making the result undistributable), then they
are *not* eligible for an -ignore tag[1].
Thank you for looking into this,
~Niels
[1] This should hopefully not come as a surprise, but figured it was
better to be explicit about it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=imDD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: