[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#713798: marked as done (nmu: check_0.9.10-2)



Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:31:35 +0100
with message-id <1372192295.14421.10.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#713798: nmu: check_0.9.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #713798,
regarding nmu: check_0.9.10-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
713798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713798
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

For some reasons, the detection whether specific flags were needed to
compile with pthread support didn't return the correct value resulting
in a generated .pc file missing some flags.

I tried rebuilding the package on my amd64 machine and now needed flags
are properly detected.

See: #712140

nmu check_0.9.10-2 . ALL . -m "Properly detect flags needed for pthreads support"

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 18:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> For some reasons, the detection whether specific flags were needed to
> compile with pthread support didn't return the correct value resulting
> in a generated .pc file missing some flags.
> 
> I tried rebuilding the package on my amd64 machine and now needed flags
> are properly detected.
> 
> See: #712140

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: