Bug#710782: transition: openturns
- To: 710782@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#710782: transition: openturns
- From: "D. Barbier" <bouzim@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 18:38:01 +0200
- Message-id: <CAMqf4EG8fm++V+Sx9jinBVWqtVizU_VJUer=HkVV4zrEvhq0XA@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "D. Barbier" <bouzim@gmail.com>, 710782@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CAMqf4EEtCuDZfpYK8ayoprxP3FF1TQt9n1HpJF=oKjdnSAsd1A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAMqf4EEtCuDZfpYK8ayoprxP3FF1TQt9n1HpJF=oKjdnSAsd1A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2013/6/2 D. Barbier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> openturns 1.1 has been uploaded into experimental, and introduces a
> soname bump. Version 1.1-3 uploaded few days ago should build fine
> everywhere if buildds have enough RAM, all issues found in earlier
> versions should now be fixed.
> Thus I would like to upload this version into unstable.
>
> No packages depend directly on libopenturns0.1, but eficas
> build-depends on python-openturns (which itself depends on
> libopenturns0.1/0.2) and feel++ build-depends on libopenturns-dev. It
> is not clear to me whether these dependencies are really necessary,
> but this is another story.
>
> Please tell me whether uploading openturns 1.1-3 into unstable is fine by you.
Hello,
Here is an update:
* openturns 1.0-4 just received an RC bug (#713524), which is already
fixed in experimental.
* openturns 1.1-3 has still not been built on armel, mips and mipsel,
and build failed on sparc with a cryptic message (The bug is not
reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem)
* Upstream is preparing a new release; I would really like to move
1.1 into sid so that I can upload 1.2 into experimental.
Please tell me whether I can upload opennturns 1.1 into sid.
Thanks,
Denis
Reply to: