[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#710782: transition: openturns



On 2013/6/2 D. Barbier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> openturns 1.1 has been uploaded into experimental, and introduces a
> soname bump. Version 1.1-3 uploaded few days ago should build fine
> everywhere if buildds have enough RAM, all issues found in earlier
> versions should now be fixed.
> Thus I would like to upload this version into unstable.
>
> No packages depend directly on libopenturns0.1, but eficas
> build-depends on python-openturns (which itself depends on
> libopenturns0.1/0.2) and feel++ build-depends on libopenturns-dev.  It
> is not clear to me whether these dependencies are really necessary,
> but this is another story.
>
> Please tell me whether uploading openturns 1.1-3 into unstable is fine by you.

Hello,

Here is an update:
 * openturns 1.0-4 just received an RC bug (#713524), which is already
fixed in experimental.
 * openturns 1.1-3 has still not been built on armel, mips and mipsel,
and build failed on sparc with a cryptic message (The bug is not
reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem)
 * Upstream is preparing a new release; I would really like to move
1.1 into sid so that I can upload 1.2 into experimental.

Please tell me whether I can upload opennturns 1.1 into sid.
Thanks,

Denis


Reply to: