Hi Adam Thanks a lot for your quick reply On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:55:48AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 10:34 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I would like to ask if it's possible to have libproc-processtable-perl > > 0.45-4, which implements a workaround for multi-cpu machine (>10 > > logical CPUs). The corresponding Debian Bug is [1]. Upstream has not > > commented on it so far, the patch was applied to the package in > > unstable and is there now for 14 days. Also it was already synced in > > Ubuntu. > > Playing devil's advocate slightly, what are the chances of machines with > >100 logical CPUs? (I'm hoping small, just noticing that the patch will > break again at that point.) Yes it will break then. The patch applied to unstable is more a workaround as a real final(!) solution[1]. [1]: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=82175#txn-1158152 Recently Jonathan Swartz of Proc-ProcessTable perl module[2], see changelog entry for 0.46 there and development began somehow again slowly[3], so the only thing I can say is that hopefully libproc-processtable-perl will get more updates during the jesse development cycle. But I cannot aswer how the changes of machines with > 100 logical CPUs will be for the time of wheezy release. [2]: http://api.metacpan.org/source/JSWARTZ/Proc-ProcessTable-0.46/Changes [3]: https://github.com/jonswar/perl-proc-processtable/commits/master Regards, Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature