[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > Please unblock package osm2pgsql.
> > 
> > Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the
> > changelog, and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug
> > #687965.
> The bug report indicates that database tables would need to be rebuilt
> in line with the 32- to 64-bit change.  Would that happen automatically,
> or is it something that users are expected to do after upgrading?

They're expected to do that on their own.

However, I noticed that osm2pgsql/testing already used BIGINT columns for osm_id
(BIGINT == int_8), maybe for some other bug of the software (which created 64
bit columns even though one asked for 32 bit). I haven't checked the version in

Now the change has been made more explicit in the code; end users (of
testing) shouldn't notice much of a difference. Should I add a short notice to
NEWS.Debian, or the like, for stable users?


 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: