[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#687728: marked as done (RM: jampal -- non distributable)

Your message dated Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:39:14 +0200
with message-id <20120922213914.GA10044@hub.kern.lc>
and subject line Re: Bug#685839: jampal: contains material without permission to redistribute
has caused the Debian Bug report #687728,
regarding RM: jampal -- non distributable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

687728: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jampal
Severity: serious
Version: 02.01.05+dfsg1-1

One example is jampal/src/org/tritonus/share/sampled/file/TAudioFileReader.java
which is at least partially copyrighted by Apple but I don't see any permission
to redistribute from Apple.

Another example is jampal/src/javazoom/jl/decoder/huffcodetab.java which
contains this:

 * Copyright (c) 1991 MPEG/audio software simulation group, All Rights Reserved
 * MPEG/audio coding/decoding software, work in progress              
 *   NOT for public distribution until verified and approved by the   
 *   MPEG/audio committee.  For further information, please contact   
 *   Davis Pan, 508-493-2241, e-mail: pan@3d.enet.dec.com             

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 03:07:15PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> please remove jampal from Testing and Sid. It contains code copyrighted
> by Apple, not suitable to be distributed by Debian.

It has been removed from testing automatically because it was removed
from sid.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

--- End Message ---

Reply to: