Re: Security-upload coming! (was: Chances to obtain a freeze-exception for condor?)
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:38:27PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > > I have uploaded an updated 'condor' package to experimental. It fixes
> > > all remaining (user-relevant) annoyances of the current version in
> > > testing. The fixes are only a few lines per bug, and they are only
> > > changes in the packaging itself. The full diff to the version in testing
> > > is attached. Here are the stats (most lines are comments/docs):
> > >
> > > debian/changelog | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > debian/condor.links | 1 -
> > > debian/condor.postinst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > debian/condor_qsub | 3 +--
> > >
> > > Bugs fixed are: #684667, #684879, and #678425 (none of them RC).
> > >
> > > Would you allow for a freeze exception of an upload to unstable with these
> > > changes (or any subset you would name)?
> > And what about FTBFS fixes for alpha?
> > http://bugs.debian.org/685892
There is now a security-related upload in the works (see below), hence it would
be perfect timing for feedback on the above questions