[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#685268: marked as done (tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb7u1)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:17:08 +0100
with message-id <7f78d7243b2656384ff169409be5df7f@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685268: Your isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+wheezy1 upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #685268,
regarding tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

685268: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685268
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal

Please unblock package isc-dhcp

Andrew hasn't yet made it clear which version he's been planning to
support in wheezy [0], but he did upload this one well before the
freeze.  Unfortunately it was udeb blocked, so it didn't go in during
the grace period.  I'm going forward with this unblock request
because there are a set of security issues that need to be
backported to whichever version is shipping with wheezy.  If
this one can go in, it will involve fewer patches, and I won't need
to use TPU or testing-security.

The differences between this version and testing's are primarily
that its two upstream point releases newer.  The debian changes
include an RFC compatibility fix and a corection for a kfreebsd
subnet issue.

CCing -boot since this involves a udeb unblock.  I understand
d-i beta2 is coming (soon?), so its likely a please wait from
that perspective.

unblock isc-dhcp/4.2.4-1

[0] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-dhcp-devel/2012-August/001435.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 17.09.2012 23:05, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I'm rejecting your isc-dhcp upload to the security archive for the following

* Uploads must be coordinated and ACKed by the security team. Unless I'm
missing something, it didn't happen this way.
* Incorrect version numbering. For Wheezy the +debNuX schema will be used. * The testing-security queue is not functional. Any security update for wheezy, during its freeze, must go through testing-proposed-updates if it
can't go through sid.

I just uploaded version 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u1 to
testing-proposed-updates.  It contains only the security patches that
were included in version 4.2.4-2 uploaded to unstable a few days ago.

"N" is "7" here, rather than "70", fwiw. Yes, I know dev ref needs updating (see my previous mails elsewhere), and it's not worth a re-upload just for that.

Accepted; thanks.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: