[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#675447: marked as done (nmu: netcdf_1:4.1.3-6)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2012 19:26:23 +0200
with message-id <20120915172623.GJ5308@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#675447: nmu: netcdf_1:4.1.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #675447,
regarding nmu: netcdf_1:4.1.3-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
675447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675447
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello

netcdf is causing FTBS for packages that rely on
/usr/include/netcdf.mod because they use gfortran-4.7 but the mod file
is built against gfortran-4.6.

nmu netcdf_1:4.1.3-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gfortran-4.7, see #671965"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=is_IS.utf8, LC_CTYPE=is_IS.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 21:54:53 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

> Hi Cyril
> 
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:48:28AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson <ojsbug@gmail.com> (01/06/2012):
> > > netcdf is causing FTBS for packages that rely on
> > > /usr/include/netcdf.mod because they use gfortran-4.7 but the mod file
> > > is built against gfortran-4.6.
> > 
> > we're trying to get that switch reverted, so binNMUing your package
> > might not be needed.
> > 
> > > nmu netcdf_1:4.1.3-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gfortran-4.7, see #671965"
> > 
> > That's incorrect anyway, the switch only happened on *{amd64,i386}.
> 
> [I'm not the maintainer of this package but looking at currently open
> RC bugs for wheezy.]
> 
> Am I correct, that as now we have (definitively) gcc defaults to 4.7
> for amd64, i386, kfreebsd-amd66 and kfreebsd-i386 a binNMU can be done?
> 
> nmu netcdf_1:4.1.3-6 . amd64,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Rebuild against gfortran-4.7, see #671965"
> 
Scheduled.  Note that architecture names need to be space separated.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: