[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681496: marked as done (unblock: gunicorn/0.14.5-1)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:25:57 +0100
with message-id <1347481557.13151.13.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681496: unblock: gunicorn/0.14.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681496,
regarding unblock: gunicorn/0.14.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

681496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock gunicorn/0.14.5. It fixes a grave security bug (#681471)
as well as a number of smaller issues.

It's been in unstable for 10 or 11 days now and I've been using it
production for that time without issue.

Many thanks.


     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 01:20 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > +<li><strong>breaking change</strong>: take the control on graceful
> > reload back. +graceful can't be overrided anymore using the on_reload
> > function.</li>
> I looked into this a little and it's my judgement that it won't actually
> break any installations, upstream are just using cautious and precise
> wording.

Hmmm, okay.  Unblocked; thanks.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: