Ping! (was: Chances to obtain a freeze-exception for condor?)
- To: debian-release <email@example.com>
- Subject: Ping! (was: Chances to obtain a freeze-exception for condor?)
- From: Michael Hanke <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:38:27 +0200
- Message-id: <20120910103827.GD22016@meiner>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-release <email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20120827200049.GA22809@meiner>
- References: <20120823083948.GA2226@meiner> <20120827200049.GA22809@meiner>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > I have uploaded an updated 'condor' package to experimental. It fixes
> > all remaining (user-relevant) annoyances of the current version in
> > testing. The fixes are only a few lines per bug, and they are only
> > changes in the packaging itself. The full diff to the version in testing
> > is attached. Here are the stats (most lines are comments/docs):
> > debian/changelog | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > debian/condor.links | 1 -
> > debian/condor.postinst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > debian/condor_qsub | 3 +--
> > Bugs fixed are: #684667, #684879, and #678425 (none of them RC).
> > Would you allow for a freeze exception of an upload to unstable with these
> > changes (or any subset you would name)?
> And what about FTBFS fixes for alpha?