[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686496: marked as done (unblock: wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2)



Your message dated Sun, 02 Sep 2012 22:59:41 +0100
with message-id <1346623181.9978.4.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686496: unblock: wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686496,
regarding unblock: wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
686496: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package wesnoth-1.10

 Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
(besides the changelog entry, obviously):

http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/wesnoth.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f59ef

unblock wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-2

 Thanks in advance,
Rhonda

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 22:55 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> [2012-09-02 15:32:04 CEST]:
> > On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 13:11 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > >  Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
> > > (besides the changelog entry, obviously):
> > > 
> > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/wesnoth.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f59ef
> > 
> > Please go ahead and let us know once the package has been accepted.
> 
>  Thanks, I just did upload it and got the ACCEPT mail.

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: