Re: Fix for #686138

[Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>]

On 2012-08-29 04:52, Koichi Akabe wrote:
> The current package contains compatibility probrem with bzr 2.6 and
> fixed version was pushed to upstream vcs.
> 
> I want to update it to newer snapshot.
> I attached a patch.
> 
> Is the new package acceptable?
> 
> Regards,
> -- Koichi Akabe vbkaisetsu at {gmail.com, debian.or.jp}
> 

Hi,

Thanks for looking into fixing this RC bug.

>
> [...]
> diff -Nru bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/debian/changelog bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/debian/changelog
> --- bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/debian/changelog	2012-05-29 07:50:34.000000000 +0900
> +++ bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/debian/changelog	2012-08-29 11:32:40.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1,3 +1,23 @@
> +bzr-stats (0.1.0+bzr51-1) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> +  * New maintainer (Closes: #668919)
> +  * New upstream snapshot
> +   + fix compatibility with bzr 2.6 (Closes: #686138)
> +  * debian/compat
> +   - up to 9

I am afraid I will have to ask you to at least drop the debhelper compat
change.

> +  * debian/rules
> +   - add get-orig-source target
> +   - change build command for dh9
> +  * debian/control
> +   - remove half broken Build-Depends: bzr (<< 2.4.0~beta1-2)
> +   - update X-Python-Version to 2.6 or later to follow bzr package
> +   - update debhelper version to 9.0.0
> +  * debian/copyright
> +   - merge contents of same field
> +   - remove undefined fields: Debianized-Date and Debianized-By

These fields do not appear to have been removed in the diff.  Are you
refering to the "Comment" field?

> +
> + -- Koichi Akabe <vbkaisetsu@gmail.com>  Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:57:29 +0900
> +


~Niels