[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8



On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:53:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:56 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 11:13 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [...]
> > > - libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2), libdb4.8 (>= 4.8.30-2),
> > > + libcurl3 (>= 7.21.0-2),
> [...]
> > Is that the only (non-changelog) change in the package?  If so then feel
> > free to get it uploaded and then come back to us with an unblock
> > request.
> 
> You appear to have done the former of those, but never bothered with the
> latter...

There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl
(needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem).

I wanted them solved before I request ia32-libs goes into testing.

> > Note that in any case the package won't migrate with #677741
> > in the way.
> 
> That wasn't meant as a suggestion to simply downgrade the bug :-p

I downgraded the bug because the critical issues have been solved.
That means that many users can install ia32-libs and use it just fine.
But not everyone can. So there is still room for improvement.

Ia32-libs is at a stage where it is possible to release it with a
slightly reduced usefullness. But idealy I would like there to be no
regression to squeeze, namely the two issues above.
 
> In an earlier thread you mentioned a number of multiarch issues with

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762

The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most
critical and trivial there is:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777

That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on
libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that.

> ia32-libs-gtk; what's the current status there?  Also:
> 
>     out of date on ia64: ia32-libs-gtk (from 20120102)

Pending removal.
 
> Regards,
> 
> Adam

MfG
	Goswin


Reply to: