Should I continue on this path (it will be completely ready in another hour), or should I let you take care of it?
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Nicholas Bamber
<nicholas@periapt.co.uk> wrote:
Phillip,
I only just realized you have picked it up again. Sorry. I should have
subscribed to the package before working on it.
I am sure you can do a better job than me. How you want to play it is
up to you. However I think the best way of keeping brewtarget in wheezy
is for me to bring the NMU forward as fast as possible and hopefully the
release team would accept it in wheezy. That way you have more time to
make the next release and you can throw away or incorporate my changes
as you wish.
On 14/07/12 08:41, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Phillip,
> If the copyright issues as per #679437 are not sorted out, brewtarget
> would most likely get removed from Debian which would be a shame. I
> have prepared a non-maintainer upload which should fix them but you can
> always do so yourself.
>
> The debdiff is attached. However this gives the misleading impression
> that the offending images have not been removed. I assume debdiff is
> treating them as zero-length files. So I include tardiffs as well.
--
Philip G. Lee
rocketman768@gmail.com