Bug#680674: transition: leptonlib
X-Debbugs-Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Hi release team,
This is a request to start a small transition for wheezy. Please
don't shoot me.
The current leptonlib packaging ships liblept.so.3 in a package with
the same name (libleptonica) as the package shipping liblept.so.1 in
squeeze. That is problematic for a few reasons:
1. Upgrading libleptonica causes liblept.so.1 to be removed,
breaking leptonica-progs and tesseract-ocr from squeeze, but this
dependency is not declared.
2. tesseract-ocr from wheezy requires liblept.so.3, but
libleptonica's shlibs file doesn't create an appropriate
dependency for that. So a versioned dependency on libleptonica
was hardcoded in 3.02.01-4, which will only make for trouble in
future library transitions.
3. There is no reason not to allow liblept.so.1 and liblept.so.3 to
be installed at the same time for a smoother upgrade, but using
the same package name prevents that (policy §8.1).
Therefore I would like to see libleptonica renamed to liblept3 in
wheezy, so the usual shlibs and upgrade mechanisms can Just Work™.
leptonlib has one reverse dependency: tesseract.
That means a tiny transition:
1. fix the package name in leptonlib (bug#664176)
2. fix the hardcoded dependency in tesseract and rebuild against
new leptonlib (bug#680598)
3. let both migrate to wheezy
title = "leptonlib";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libleptonica" | .depends ~ "liblept3";
is_good = .depends ~ "liblept3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libleptonica";
I realize this is very late, but I think it's important, hence the
request. If there's some better way to go about this, I'd be happy to
hear about it. Other thoughts welcome, too.
Thanks for your work,