[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#679020: marked as done (nmu: ovito_0.9.5-2)



Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:31:50 +0200
with message-id <20120625213150.GX6468@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#679020: nmu: ovito_0.9.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #679020,
regarding nmu: ovito_0.9.5-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
679020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

libtachyon-dev didn't depend on libtachyon-0.99 (see #675714). This bug affected
ovito, it failed to build. Now the bug is fixed and hopefully ovito should build 
in all architectures.

nmu ovito_0.9.5-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fixed libtachyon, see #675714."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (850, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Mònica Ramírez Arceda <monica@debian.org> (25/06/2012):
> libtachyon-dev didn't depend on libtachyon-0.99 (see #675714). This bug affected
> ovito, it failed to build. Now the bug is fixed and hopefully ovito should build 
> in all architectures.
> 
> nmu ovito_0.9.5-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against fixed libtachyon, see #675714."

Hello,

since it failed to build, that's not about rebuilding it (binNMU) but
about trying to build it again, since the previous attempt failed.

That's called a give back, which is done like that:
  gb ovito . ALL

and that's usually requested on debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org

Anyway, I've just done that, thanks.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: