Re: open-iscsi's propagation to Wheezy
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:42:40PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> > If nothing provides scsi-modules on arm*, the open-iscsi-udeb needs to not
> > depend on it on those architecture. I don't know enough about the packages
> > off-hand to be sure whether that by extension means that open-iscsi-udeb
> > may not make sense on arm* at all.
> I will. That's the last resort. :-)
> Just that I'm not aware of the provider of scsi-modules in D-I.
It's provided by scsi-modules-* udebs, which are built by the kernel
> Colin: This patch came from you. Do you have any comments? Your intent with
> the patch was to provide iscsi root installation support in D-I.
There's only any point in building open-iscsi-udeb on architectures that
ship iscsi_tcp.ko in a udeb, or have it built into their kernel.
According to build logs and Contents-udeb-*, that's currently:
amd64 i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc
I would probably be inclined not to bother building open-iscsi-udeb on
ARM, but, if you're going to do so, the kernel packaging needs to be
changed to build and ship this module.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]