Hi (especially) Mehdi, I’m wondering why http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html lists agda as bad, and I assume that ben considers it a problem if an arch:all package is uninstallable on an architecture, even though the arch:any packages there never have been built. Is that a bug or a feature? I’m not sure what the correct thing to do would be. Maybe something like “ignore arch:all packages from sources that build both arch:all and arch:any packages on architectures where no arch:any packages have been built”. Although such special-casing definitively goes against my sense for aesthetic formalizations :-) Gruß, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part