Re: s-p-u: security update for xfs package
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 21:02 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 19:10:01 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >From reading the bug log for #521107, it appears that the maintainer
> > disagrees either that there is an issue which requires fixing, or with
> > the proposed fix (which of those two options is applicable wasn't
> > entirely clear to me as there's no reply to his last message in the
> > log). Is that the case?
> >
> This was clarified in a private discussion with Luciano, sorry for not
> updating the bug log.
Ah; thanks for the clarification.
> Luciano's last patch seems fine. I still believe this is a pretty minor
> issue, and I think it should be fixed in sid before being considered for
> stable, but I don't have an objection to this update.
>From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in
unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems
arise. :)
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: