[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SRM] Update of gnupg/gnupg2 to fix a memory leak (was: Bug#345911: gnupg: Memory leak fix)



* Daniel Leidert (daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In the past it had been reported several times, that importing a large
> keyring (for example the Debian keyring) might need a really long time
> and make gnupg allocate much memory (trying to reproduce the issue I
> observed a DoS). I recently reported the issue to Werner Koch and he
> found a memory leak and fixed the issue. It seems the patch applies to
> gnupg (probably to 1.4.6 in oldstable too) as well as gnupg2.
> 
> Should this be fixed in stable and olstable? Then I would prepare the
> packages for gnupg (CCed Eric for gnupg2).
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/345911 (#345911, #113897, #172115)
> https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1034
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=31;filename=345911_svn4993.diff;att=1;bug=345911
> http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/STABLE-BRANCH-1-4/g10/keyring.c?root=GnuPG&rev=4993&r1=4963&r2=4993 (gnupg 1.4)
> http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/g10/keyring.c?root=GnuPG&rev=4994&r1=4980&r2=4994 (gnupg2)
> 
> Regards, Daniel
> 

I didn't see any response to this, did anything come of it?

-- 
Eric Dorland <eric@kuroneko.ca>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: