[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: gThumb upload for Lenny



On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:18:50 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:

> * David Paleino [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:52:02 +0100]:
> 
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:31:07 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> 
> > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:35:08 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> 
> > > > Hello Luk,
> 
> > > > I suggest that David follows this approach for getting the critical bug
> > > > fixed in stable :
> 
> > > > 1.  file a temporary "serious" bug against gthumb 3:2.10.10-2
> > > >     to prevent it from entering testing,
> 
> > > There's no need for such a bug: why would we want to prevent it from
> > > entering Squeeze? Once in testing, I can upload to s-p-u without any
> > > problem -- the upload to t-p-u would just happen to makes things faster.
> 
> > Obviously, if RMs are ok with an upload to t-p-u, I'll do it that way, no
> > need to pointlessly delay a fix.
> 
> Hello,

Hello dato,

> not sure if this still needs reply from us. In case it wasn't
> mentioned, I think an upload to p-u will work now, since the checks have
> been relaxed by ftpmaster at our request.

The previous upload I made was moved by luk into the pending
queue:

http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html
http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable_diffs/gthumb_2.10.8-1+lenny1.debdiff

In the meanwhile, gthumb 3:2.10.10-2 (containing the fix backported to the
Lenny package) migrated to testing, so the t-p-u upload isn't needed anymore.

> The only caveat is that the fixed/new package will have to be in testing

It already is, see above.

> by the time we want to release 5.0.1 (i.e., the check is delayed until
> point release time).

I believe we're done then. The fix is in testing already ("mixed" with a new
upstream version), and a package containing the important fixes only is already
in p-u pending (see link above too)

Thank you for your interest,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: