Re: noweb stuck in sid
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]:
>
> > How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the
> > dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied with
> > the version of icon that's in testing?
>
> There is no noweb in armel in testing, though, so in order to migrate
> noweb/2.11b-7/armel, britney wants to migrate iconx/9.4.3-1/armel first.
> And see #475952 about that...
> However, since noweb/armel is broken in testing anyway, migrating it
> does not makes things worse, so I've added a force hint to let noweb
> migrate.
And to fix that last part, should I upload a icon/9.4.2-2.8/armel to
t-p-u or can you force icon/9.4.3-1/armel in?
The traditional way of "fixing" icon build problems was to add -O0
as default - now all archs (including sparc) have this flag enabled :-|
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Reply to: