Re: Upcoming xulrunner transition
* Mike Hommey (email@example.com) [080608 16:18]:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey (firstname.lastname@example.org) [080608 15:46]:
> > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:09:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > > If my network stays in this state for the next few days and I can't
> > > > > upload, maybe I can send an interdiff between the last .diff.gz in
> > > > > experimental and the new .diff.gz so that someone could upload for me.
> > > > > Volunteers?
> > > >
> > > > That'd work. But please tell me what all needs to be uploaded, and in
> > > > which order (and sign the interdiff of course :) ). As alternative, you
> > > > can send me a signed dsc + diff, and I can do the builds and uploads (so
> > > > basically you have a source-only "upload").
> > >
> > > Actually, I've been fortunate enough to have some networking back,
> > > and I'm currently uploading a whole new package (without arch indep
> > > packages except the java interfaces) to gluck
> > > (http://people.debian.org/~glandium/). Well I was fortunate until a few
> > > minutes ago, when it broke again, but I had enough networking to upload
> > > almost everything, except the -dbg and python-xpcom packages.
> > That's enough, thank you.
> > One question (just to be sure): We speak about
> > /home/glandium/public_html/xulrunner_1.9~rc2-1_amd64.changes ?
> Yes, and actually, in the meanwhile, network is back again, and I could
> finish the upload. Which means the built packages there are all there
> and ok (I rsync'ed again, just to be sure)
Ok. Unfortunatly xulrunner seems to FTBFS on all arches due to missing
javaxpcom.jar (some difference between -B and -b I assume), see
If we need another upload anyways, can we do an libxul-dev for the
moment that just points to xulrunner-dev, so that we can get away with a
couple of binNMUs in some cases?