Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 08:59:43AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: >> Nicolas Boullis wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> One month ago, em8300 was removed from testing, because of #342377, with >>> the following comment from Steve Langasek: >>> >>> # long-standing brokenness, can get back in if maintainer gets the new >>> upstream version packaged >>> >>> >>> Now, a package for the new upstream version is mostly packages (I'd >>> still like to get the templates reviewed by debian-l10n-english). Is it >>> alright if I upload to unstable and expect it to reach etch in 10 days? >> It's ok to upload it, though I'm afraid it's unlikely to reach etch. > > It's been in unstable for 9 days now; how about unblocking and giving it a > chance to be in etch? em8300 was in sarge and I think it would be a regression not to have it in etch. Unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature