On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 03:06 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit : > > On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able > > > to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash. > > > > There are clearly two plausible solutions to the underlying problem: > > > > 1. Change gnucash to conform to the new behavior of glib, > > AIUI this has already been done, as gnucash doesn't generate such files > anymore. What makes you say this? AFAICT, this is not so. At least, the offending keys are still defined and used in, for example, gnucash/src/gnome/gnc-plugin-page-register.c. Current gnucash trunk of this file can be seen at http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/browser/gnucash/trunk/src/gnome/gnc-plugin-page-register.c Search for "Register Type", "Account Name", "Register Style", "Double Line Mode". Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part