Re: Bug#404888: glib2.0: cannot go into testing; causes gnucash regrsession
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Sorry, but you don't make a soname bump just for the sake of
> applications ignoring function semantics.
Right. You also don't introduce regressions in an indeterminate number of
other packages during a freeze just because those packages didn't work the
way you think they should work, either.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: