On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 20:45 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > As this may break more applications (earlier version broke locale > parsing and gnomevfs), we should probably keep that code, reduce it to a > warning for etch and then work out (together with upstream) how to solve > this for the future. Quite wrong, but in the right ballpark. We simply should not allow that version of glib into etch at all. This is not the time to be scrounging up hacks. The sad thing is that this makes gnucash maintenance during the freeze much worse, but I will simply have to cope. There is, however, no grounds whatsoever AFAICS for allowing these recent glib versions into etch, and as long as they stay out, no regression in the etch gnucash will occur. Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part