[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: why are new upstream versions of glib being uploaded?



On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 01:46 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Dezember 2006:
> 
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:28:23AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > Thomas Bushnell BSG schrieb am Dienstag, den 26. Dezember 2006:
> > > 
> > > > Why are new upstream releases being added to upstable of the glib2.0
> > > > package?  We are in a freeze, I thought.  And one seems perhaps to be
> > > > responsible for a regression in gnucash (see #404585).  
> > > Eh, we are in a testing freeze, not in an unstable freeze. 
> > > 
> > 
> > IIRC, the guidance from vorlon was no new upstream versions to unstable,
> > only to experimental.  That is, until after the release.  You can
> > probably search the list archives and find the exact message if you
> > like.
> To my understanding this was until etch wasn't fully frozen. But maybe I
> misunderstood something. Dear Release Team please enlighten me. 

Etch *is* fully frozen, and has been since around December 11.

Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: