It appears that currently sysklogd 1.4.1-18 is in Etch. However, on 18 September [0], -19 was uploaded. The upload message shows urgency low, which is in conflict with [1], which shows that -19 has urgency high. I am wondering: a) which is correct? b) should -19 not be migrated (though -20 is already there, which might be a better choice)? The LSB compliant init scripts look fairly important, or at least very nice to have in Etch. Regards, -Roberto [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sysklogd/news/20060918T113208Z.html [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/sysklogd/sysklogd_1.4.1-20/changelog -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature