Re: python 2.3
Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 01:25 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
>>> The python team has apparently decreed that python 2.3 will not be in
>>> etch. This forces every package to use the new version. Surely it is
>>> too late in the release cycle to be risking regressions in this way?
>
>> please could you provide details why you think this causes
>> regressions?
>
> gnucash 2.0.2-2 built without failures on arm, and every other arch.
>
> gnucash 2.0.2-2.1, your NMU, fails to build on arm. This is known as a
> "regression", and the obvious explanation is that your change may be
> responsible. Distressingly, you have declared it "not your problem", so
> after making an unannounced NMU, of a non-RC issue, you now proceed to
> disclaim any responsibility for what you broke. Splendid.
This is not a regression, the build failure comes from the build daemon.
For a few weeks, the arm build daemon called "netwinder" fails to build
every package that uses /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.6.
gnucash is now built on arm and is in the archive.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
Reply to: