[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unblock mdadm 2.5.2-7

also sprach Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> [2006.07.20.1732 +0100]:
> AFAIK mdadm 2.5.2-7 is still fairly new in unstable. From a d-i POV there 
> is no need to rush it into testing.

Then I misunderstood you.

> We plan to release D-I Beta3 using mdrun, which is still present in this 
> version of mdadm and has been tested to work.
> The deprecation of mdrun in D-I will happen after the Beta3 release. 
> Before we can do that mdadm 2.5.2-7 needs to be in testing, but that is 
> no reason to rush it.

Okay, but it still needs to be unblocked. :)

Also note that I purposely referred to beta4, not beta3.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
the unix philosophy basically involves
giving you enough rope to hang yourself.
and then some more, just to be sure.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: