Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > we discussed in Vancouver to keep the old library versions around in > testing as long as anything depends on it, and still allow the new > version in. Today, I had a bit time to fiddle around with britney. What > I actually tested was: > foo | 1 | unstable | source, i386 > libfoo1 | 1 | unstable | i386 > bar | 1 | unstable | source, i386 > (with bar=1 depending on libfoo1, bar=2 depending on libfoo2). After the > testing run (of course minimum waiting switched off) everything was in > testing. Now upgrading foo to version 2, and removing libfoo1 in > unstable, and adding libfoo2. After the next testing run, I had: > foo | 2 | testing | source, i386 > libfoo1 | 1 | testing | i386 > libfoo2 | 2 | testing | i386 > bar | 1 | testing | source, i386 Isn't the fact that the source for libfoo1 is no longer in the archive a major problem[as far as licensing is concerned]? Travis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature