Re: Classification of some arm builds that are 'Building'
- To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
- Cc: arm@buildd.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org, octave2.0@packages.debian.org, mico@packages.debian.org, gmfsk@packages.debian.org, libdbd-sqlite-perl@packages.debian.org, libgnome2-perl@packages.debian.org, crossfire-client@packages.debian.org, unison@packages.debian.org, crimson@packages.debian.org, timidity@packages.debian.org, ant-phone@packages.debian.org, gnobog@packages.debian.org, zinf@packages.debian.org, gnome-cups-manager@packages.debian.org, sear@packages.debian.org, gnuradio@packages.debian.org, quiteinsanegimpplugin@packages.debian.org, kvirc@packages.debian.org, attal@packages.debian.org, cuyo@packages.debian.org, arson@packages.debian.org, redland@packages.debian.org, sip4-qt3@packages.debian.org, gnome-applets@packages.debian.org, multisync@packages.debian.org, enigmail@packages.debian.org, kbear@packages.debian.org, psi@packages.debian.org, mcrypt@packages.debian.org, alogg@packages.debian.org, xsidplay@packages.debian.org, illuminator@packages.debian.org, libbonobomm1.3@packages.debian.org, libselinux@packages.debian.org, renaissance@packages.debian.org, tetex-bin@packages.debian.org, simulavr@packages.debian.org, bidentd@packages.debian.org, owl@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Classification of some arm builds that are 'Building'
- From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:34:29 +0200
- Message-id: <20040919213428.GC2172@grand>
- In-reply-to: <20040914110647.GA18918@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
- References: <20040914110647.GA18918@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 01:06:47PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Dear arm buildd-administrator,
>
> unison: Build-Depends uninstallable, should be Dep-Wait
The version in sid should close this problem...
There was a missing build deps long time ago, but since there was no new
build. Once it will be build, it should go straight into sarge and close
this bug
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: