Re: Criteria for getting a upload in tpu approved (exim4)
On 2004-07-15 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote:
> On 2004-07-15 Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 01:32:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[exim4 in TPU]
> > Please don't include anything
> > unnecessary/risky or anything that makes the diff (both of source
> > packages and binary packages) hard to read.
> Well, I had planned to simply upload 4.34-2 + the translation updates
> currently in CVS with a different version number. This does not fit
> the criteria you listed above,
[...]
> OTOH 4.34-2 is rather well tested, it has been in sid since 2004-05-31
> and I'd like to get it into testing.
[...]
Well, I'll take the lack of answers as a No ...
> If this is unacceptable I can try to prepare a 4.32-2.sarge.1
> consisting of 4.32-2 + translation-updates + CAN-2004-0400.
... and will implement this instead.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
Reply to: