debian-release May 2000 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today)
J.A. Bezemer
Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today)
Richard Braakman
Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today)
Daniel Jacobowitz
CONFIRMED: Boot NOT floppies okay (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today)
Adam Di Carlo
Re: CONFIRMED: Boot NOT floppies okay (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today)
Ben Collins
Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today)
Nils Rennebarth
critical potato archive inconsistency
Adam Di Carlo
Re: critical potato archive inconsistency
Brian Mays
Installed 2 packages
Richard Braakman
Re: kernels in potato destabilized
Richard Braakman
Re: kernels in potato destabilized
Brian Mays
More packages installed today
Richard Braakman
Re: More packages installed today
Daniel Jacobowitz
[SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled
Adrian Bunk
Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled
J.A. Bezemer
Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled
Hamish Moffatt
Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled
Adrian Bunk
potato release status -- boot-floppies 2.2.13
Adam Di Carlo
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html
Richard Braakman
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html
J.A. Bezemer
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html
David Huggins-Daines
Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html
J.A. Bezemer
Contents for potato/main/upgrade-i386
J.A. Bezemer
Packages installed today
Richard Braakman
IMPORTANT - powerpc broken
Daniel Jacobowitz
Re: 2.2.13 okay for first cycle? (was Re: Packages installed today)
Adam Di Carlo
More installs to frozen
Richard Braakman
Re: First Test Cycle starts today
Josip Rodin
Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Jim Lynch
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Josip Rodin
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Jim Lynch
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Josip Rodin
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Richard Braakman
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Julian Gilbey
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Julian Gilbey
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Mike Bilow
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Herbert Xu
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Petr Cech
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Herbert Xu
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Josip Rodin
[dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
J.A. Bezemer
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Richard Braakman
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Raphael Hertzog
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
J.A. Bezemer
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Joey Hess
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
J.A. Bezemer
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Daniel Jacobowitz
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Richard Braakman
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
J.A. Bezemer
Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Mike Bilow
Upgrade.tar available (was Re: [dark: READ!] CD images)
J.A. Bezemer
Re: Upgrade.tar available (was Re: [dark: READ!] CD images)
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Upgrade.tar available (was Re: [dark: READ!] CD images)
Ben Collins
regarding invalid boot-floppies 2.2.14
Adam Di Carlo
Re: regarding invalid boot-floppies 2.2.14
Jim Studt
Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Karl M. Hegbloom
Up and running with a fully working X configuration?
Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: Up and running with a fully working X configuration?
Randolph Chung
potato section on security.debian.org
Wichert Akkerman
Re: potato section on security.debian.org
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: potato section on security.debian.org
Wichert Akkerman
Re: potato section on security.debian.org
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: potato section on security.debian.org
Wichert Akkerman
RE: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works wo uld invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Andrew Weiss
need word on next test cycle
Adam Di Carlo
Re: need word on next test cycle
Wichert Akkerman
Which kernels to keep?
Richard Braakman
Re: Which kernels to keep?
J.A. Bezemer
Re: Which kernels to keep?
Adam Di Carlo
Re: Which kernels to keep?
Ben Collins
Re: Which kernels to keep?
Herbert Xu
Re: Which kernels to keep?
Mike Bilow
2.2.15 not out yet (was Re: Deadline?)
Adam Di Carlo
GNOME 1.0 "Bongo GNOME" Now Available
by way of Elmar Fasel <ElmarFasel@gmx.de>
Re: GNOME 1.0 "Bongo GNOME" Now Available
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
No test cycle yet
Richard Braakman
Test cycle status
Richard Braakman
Installed today
Richard Braakman
The last update was on 10:06 GMT Sat May 11. There are 82 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc