[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#430297: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:17:40 +0200
with message-id <200706301817.47292.Sune@vuorela.dk>
and subject line libqt4-dev:  ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libqt4-dev
Severity: serious
User: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Usertags: goal-ldbl128

Discussed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/05/msg01173.html

With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the 'long double'
data type did change from a 64bit representation to a 128bit
representation on alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390. To allow
partial upgrades of packages, we will need to rename all
packages holding libraries with the long double data type in
their API.  Both libc and libstdc++ do not need to be renamed,
because they support both representations.  We rename the library
packages on all architectures to avoid name mismatches between
architectures (you can avoid the renaming by supporting both
datatype representations in the library as done in glibc and
libstdc++, but unless a library is prepared for that, it does not
        seem to be worth the effort).

It is suggested to rename a package libfoo1 to libfoo1ldbl;
please wait with the renaming if the package depends on
another library package which needs renaming.

This package has been indentified as one with header files in
/usr/include matching 'long *double'. Please close this bug report
if it is a false positive, or rename the package accordingly.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

The full class definition of the QTypeInfo<long double> is in the header file, 
so no need to do anything here.


How can I do for resetting the URL?

You should doubleclick on the window and therefore from Outlook Express NT you 
have to save from a back-end on a RAM jumper to the forward for renaming a 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: