[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#230833: marked as done (kdebase-bin: kstart can make a window show up on the wrong desktop)

Your message dated Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:21:33 +0200
with message-id <200406251521.33141.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
and subject line Invalid upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 19:09:44 +0000
>From kjetil@kjernsmo.net Mon Feb 02 11:09:44 2004
Return-path: <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Received: from pooh.kjernsmo.net [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AnjS3-0002Oh-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:09:43 -0800
Received: from ti100710a080-1370.bb.online.no ([] helo=owl.kjernsmo.net)
	by pooh.kjernsmo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1AnjRV-0004X3-QO; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:09:09 +0100
Received: from kjetil by owl.kjernsmo.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AnjR0-0002Ay-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:08:38 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kdebase-bin: kstart can make a window show up on the wrong desktop
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:08:38 +0100
Message-Id: <E1AnjR0-0002Ay-00@owl.kjernsmo.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 

Package: kdebase-bin
Version: 4:3.1.4-1
Severity: normal

If I go 
kstart --desktop 4 --activate kmail --check

to have kmail check for any new mail, kmail will do its think okay, but if I 
subsequently try to open a new window in some other application in a different 
desktop, that new window will also appear in desktop 4. Which is what I expect to 
see. The completely unrelated appplication should open its windows in the desktop 
it uses. 

It is 100% reproducible to me, and it affects both new applications (for example 
opening KEdit by clicking on a text file on the Desktop) and widget windows of a 
running application, both KDE applications and non-KDE applications (for example 
if I go Ctrl+F in Firebird, the Find window will appear on desktop 4).

This bug has been in every version of KDE I've tried, and while all my systems 
are Debian systems, it could be an upstream bug. It is of course just an 
annoyance, but it is getting rather annoying now... :-) 

In case someone wondered, I have this bound by lineakd to a special key on my 
keyboard, so I do this frequently, but it is reproducible from the command line 

My system is mostly from unstable, but I decided to stabilize and use testing 
sources a few weeks ago, and so I don't have the latest kde packages, but from the 
KDE changelogs, it doesn't seem to have been any significant work on this for 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux owl 2.4.23-backstreet-ruby.2003-12-26.3-owl #1 Fri Dec 26 23:23:03 CET 2003 i686

Versions of packages kdebase-bin depends on:
ii  kdelibs4                   4:3.1.4-3     KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2               2.3.16-1      Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio2                  1.6b-1        The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6                      2.3.2.ds1-11  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102                2.6.10-6      client library to control the FAM 
ii  libfontconfig1             2.2.1-13      generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6               2.1.7-1.1     FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.3.3-0pre1 GCC support library
ii  libpam0g                   0.76-15       Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libpng12-0            PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt              3:3.2.1-6     Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libstdc++5                 1:3.3.3-0pre1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxcursor1                1.0.2-4       X Cursor management library
ii  libxft2                    2.1.2-5       FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxrender1                0.8.3-5       X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1]       4.3.0-0pre1v3 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibs                      4.3.0-0pre1v3 X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.2.1-3     compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

Received: (at 230833-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2004 13:20:25 +0000
>From kjetil@kjernsmo.net Fri Jun 25 06:20:24 2004
Return-path: <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Received: from pooh.kjernsmo.net [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bdqcy-0004Ex-00; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 06:20:24 -0700
Received: from ti100710a080-2479.bb.online.no ([])
	by pooh.kjernsmo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BdqcT-0007qd-OV
	for 230833-close@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:19:53 +0200
From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
To: 230833-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Invalid upstream
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:21:33 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200406251521.33141.kjetil@kjernsmo.net>
Delivered-To: 230833-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 

Well, my bug was marked invalid upstream... Basically, what I was trying 
to do is a bit more complex than the docs made it out to be. But I 
guess I should be closing this bug anyway, to avoid others wasting time 
on it.

Reply to: