On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:25:02PM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote: -snip- > About the issues we were discussing: > > * get rid of non-mt packages > -> Could save quite some buildd time, but might upset some people > still depending on it. I wouldn't do it yet for Qt 3.0 > personally. This is probably not a big deal if the remaining two packages could be fixed and could save a huge amount of time on the m68k buildds. > * get rid of embedded stuff > -> prolly not a good idea, you seem to have changed your mind here > too or I misunderstood you in the first place. Is this really needed in the qt-x11-free package there is also a qt3 embedded source that could generate these packages right? > * get rid of libqt3-compat-headers > -> I disagreed, but Ben convinced me. Yea, Ben's idea here seems good. > * move a lot of dev stuff into one -dev package > -> Don't really like the idea, since it makes all people install > more stuff they don't need, and I still seem to miss the advantage. Primary advantage is the removal of an arch all package in the dev package chain, which helps packages to build. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature