Re: QT needs new maintainer(s), or at least an NMU
Martin Loschwitz writes:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 08:53:54AM -0400, Christopher Martin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I had assumed that the lack of QT updates was a conscious choice by
>> the KDE maintainers to hold off on uploading QT 3.3. But your
>> message implies that this isn't really the case.
>>
> As far as I am concerned, KDE 3.2 is still not officially certified
> for running with Qt 3.3, is it?
It is. On http://www.kde.org/info/requirements/3.2.php, it says "Qt
>= 3.2.3".
> Anyway, Qt 3.3 should not go into Sarge, I think.
Why not ? It's been released for more than 4 months already, which
means it's about the same age as KDE 3.2.
cheers
domi
Reply to: