[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#668431: marked as done (PTS: binary package description is blank when package is not in unstable)

Your message dated Thu, 18 Apr 2013 05:55:34 +0000
with message-id <E1UShok-00062h-Fi@vasks.debian.org>
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2967
has caused the Debian Bug report #668431,
regarding PTS: binary package description is blank when package is not in unstable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
668431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

It would be helpful to show binary descriptions in some way to save finding
them elsewhere for unfamiliar packages, e.g. during a BSP. Perhaps
it could be a tooltip on the binary package links (trimmed to the first
paragraph maybe, for sanity).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2967

This bug was closed by Paul Wise (pabs) in SVN revision 2967.
Note that it might take some time until the qa.debian.org code has
been updated and cronjobs have picked up changed data.

Commit message:

Show binary package descriptions even when the binaries have been removed (Closes: #668431)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: