[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#639041: marked as done (PTS mail interface doesn't have an up-to-date list of packages)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:19:42 +0200
with message-id <20110825091942.GN4568@rivendell.home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#639041: PTS mail interface doesn't have an up-to-date list of packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #639041,
regarding PTS mail interface doesn't have an up-to-date list of packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
639041: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639041
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pts

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Fabian Knittel wrote:
> Dear Owners,
> 
> the package "fdsend" was accepted into unstable on 2011-08-17, but for
> some reason, the pts answering daemon still complains about it.  See below:
> 
> Am 23.08.2011 15:47, schrieb owner@packages.qa.debian.org:
> > Processing commands for pts@qa.debian.org:
> > 
> >> Subject: Web subscription for fdsend package
> > 
> >> subscribe fdsend fabian.knittel@avona.com
> > fdsend is neither a source package nor a binary package. 
> > It may be a 'pseudo package' or a mistake...
> >
> > A confirmation mail has been sent to fabian.knittel@avona.com.
> 
> Maybe the list of packages isn't properly kept in sync somewhere?

Indeed, the list that was used is no longer provide by the BTS and
in commit r2518 I updated some other part of the code to work without
that sources.map file. At that time I did not notice that the mail
part of the PTS was still using it... cf $sources in perl/common.pl.

So we have to reintroduce that file somehow (UDD export?) or adjust the mail
part to get this information in some other way. Giovanni, do you feel like
taking care of this problem ?

---
r2518 | hertzog | 2011-05-01 22:34:08 +0200 (dim. 01 mai 2011) | 8 lignes

Stop relying on sources.map file that used to be provided by the BTS.
Instead we compute our own map.
[...]
---

> The subscription process appears to work and mails to
> fdsend@packages.qa.debian.org are properly forwarded, so this appears to
> be a purely cosmetic issue.

Yes, it's only cosmetic.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Did it in the patch attached. I give no guarantee for the Perl part,
> while the Python part is also tested.

It looks fine. The python part is not very pythonic howewer. "print >> f"
is usually better written as f.write("foo\n"). I changed it before
committing, hopefully I broke nothing.

> Of course I still have no permissions to directly commit this patch.

I will take care to request your addition to the QA team.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
                      ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: