Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable

To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@freegeek.org>, 559863@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Walter Franzini <walter.franzini@gmail.com>, Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>, Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable
From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:58:57 +0100
Message-id: <20091223185857.GE13301@rivendell>
Reply-to: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, 559863@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20091209053852.GI1959@claws.fglan>
References: <20091207104732.15840.36692.reportbug@rincewind.suse.cz> <20091209053852.GI1959@claws.fglan>

retitle 559863 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources
retitle 561568 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources
retitle 560352 DDPO doesn't deal with multiple versions in Sources
thanks

On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> reports 2:2.0.6-4 for unstable. although most architectures, except hurd-i386,
> have version 2:2.0.48-1 in testing and unstable.
> 
> seems gsynaptics is also very outdated on hurd-i386, so my guess is that has
> something to do with it.

Indeed, I just fixed the PTS (packages.qa.debian.org) to deal correctly
with the presence of multiple versions in Sources files. That problem
should shortly be gone.

The DDPO is still unfixed though.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable
  - From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@freegeek.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable
Next by Date: Processed: patch for maintainers-needed.pl
Previous by thread: Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#559863: wrongly reports package version in unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread