Re: [RFS] QA upload of ncpfs merging all Ubuntu changes
- To: James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net>
- Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [RFS] QA upload of ncpfs merging all Ubuntu changes
- From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:02:14 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901271440280.12124@wr-linux02>
- In-reply-to: <1233059176.9495.8.camel@flash>
- References: <1232031945.6812.229.camel@flash> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0901151712000.28989@wr-linux02> <1233059176.9495.8.camel@flash>
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, James Westby wrote:
I have just put an updated package at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/ncpfs_2.2.6-6/ncpfs_2.2.6-6.dsc
Thanks. Just uploading the sponsored package.
The remaining lintian issues are:
W: ncpfs source: ancient-libtool contrib/php/ltmain.sh 1.5.0
W: libncp: maintainer-script-ignores-errors postinst
I'd like to see these both vanishing of one of the next potantial
uploads - but for now I see no reason to stop th emore important fixes.
W: libncp: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libncp.so.2.3.0
usr/lib/libncp.so
I'm a bit undecided whether this should be fixed or not.
W: libncp: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libncp2.3
Same here. The warning has a honest background.
N: 33 tags overridden (33 warnings)
Overrides are fine.
all of which are problems that shouldn't be overriden, but that didn't
seem appropriate to fix now.
I perfectly agree that some warnings should be overriden but the ones
you left should stay for further investigation.
Thanks for your work on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: